Duplex (telecommunications)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A duplex communication system is a system composed of two connected parties or devices which can communicate with one another in both directions. (The term duplex is not used when describing communication between more than two parties or devices.)
Duplex systems are employed in nearly all communications networks, either to allow for a communication "two-way street" between two connected parties or to provide a "reverse path" for the monitoring and remote adjustment of equipment in the field.
Contents |
[edit] Half-Duplex
A half-duplex system provides for communication in both directions, but only one direction at a time (not simultaneously). Typically, once a party begins receiving a signal, it must wait for the transmitter to stop transmitting, before replying.
An example of a half-duplex system is a two-party system such as a "walkie-talkie" style two-way radio, wherein one must use "Over" or another procedure to indicate the end of transmission, and ensure that only one party transmits at a time, because both parties transmit on the same frequency. A good analogy for a half-duplex system would be a one lane road with traffic controllers at each end. Traffic can flow in both directions, but only one direction at a time with this being regulated by the controllers.
- Note that this is one of two contradictory definitions for half-duplex. This definition matches the ANSI standard. For more detail, see Simplex communication.
[edit] Full-Duplex
A full-duplex system allows communication in both directions, and unlike half-duplex, allows this to happen simultaneously. Land-line telephone networks are full-duplex since they allow both callers to speak and be heard at the same time. A good analogy for a full-duplex system would be a two lane road with one lane for each direction.
Examples: Telephone, Mobile Phone, etc.
Two way radios can be, for instance, designed as full-duplex systems, which transmit on one frequency and receive on a different frequency. This is also called frequency-division duplex. Frequency-division-duplex systems can be extended to farther distances using pairs of simple repeater stations, owing to the fact the communications transmitted on any one frequency always travels in the same direction.
[edit] Emulation of full duplex in shared physical media
Where channel access methods are used in point to multipoint networks such as cellular networks for dividing forward and reverse communication channels on the same physical communications medium, they are known as duplexing methods, such as:
[edit] Time division duplex
Time division duplex (TDD) is the application of time-division multiplexing to separate outward and return signals. It emulated full duplex communication over a half duplex communication link. Time division duplex has a strong advantage in the case where the asymmetry of the uplink and downlink data speed is variable. As the amount of uplink data increases, more bandwidth can dynamically be allocated to that and as it shrinks it can be taken away. Another advantage is that the uplink and downlink radio paths are likely to be very similar in the case of a slow moving system. This means that techniques such as beamforming work well with TDD systems.
Examples of TDD systems are:
- The UMTS/WCDMA TDD mode (for indoor use)
- The TD-SCDMA system
- DECT
- IEEE 802.16 WiMax TDD mode
- Halph-duplex packet mode networks based on carrier sense multiple access, for example 2-wire or hubbed Ethernet, Wireless local area networks and Bluetooth, can be considered as TDD systems, albeit not TDMA with fixed frame length.
[edit] Frequency division duplex
Frequency division duplex (FDD) is the application of frequency-division multiplexing to separate outward and return signals. The uplink and downlink sub-bands are said to be separated by the "frequency offset". Frequency division duplex is much more efficient in the case of symmetric traffic. In this case TDD tends to waste bandwidth during switchover from transmit to receive, has greater inherent latency, and may require more complex, more power-hungry circuitry.
Another advantage of FDD is that it makes radio planning easier and more efficient since base stations do not "hear" each other (as they transmit and receive in different sub-bands) and therefore will normally not interfere each other. With TDD systems, care must be taken to keep guard bands between neighboring base stations (which decreases spectral efficiency) or to synchronize base stations so they will transmit and receive at the same time (which increases network complexity and therefore cost, and reduces bandwidth allocation flexibility as all base stations and sectors will be forced to use the same uplink/downlink ratio)
Examples of FDD systems are:
[edit] Examples
- Telephone networks
- Mobile phone networks
- CB radio
- Internet Relay Chat
