Talk:Dungeon Keeper
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| High | This article is on a subject of High priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Other games
Needs info on original design of Dungeon Keeper (screenshots have a typical dungeon and skeleton), and cancelled Dungeon Keeper 3.
Dungeon Keeper is actually based on the Syndicate Wars engine, which in turn is based on the Magic Carpet engine. Should we consider the engine to be the Magic Carpet engine or the Syndicate Wars engine? I would leave it as Magic Carpet engine based on an interview with Molyneux search for Magic Carpet). However, if we do this then we also have to consider that Populous: The Beginning is based on the Magic Carpet engine which also seems to be the case in several articles on the web [1] (search for Magic Carpet). --analoguedragon 15:46, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Um, this quote about DK3: "Bullfrog discontinued this idea, as it was above land so therefore no longer "Dungeon" keeper."... I find it hard to believe that they began to produce a game, realised that it wasn't accurately described by its title, and as a result, stopped producing it. Anybody able to provide a more accurate description of events? --Justdig 21:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- EA pulled it when they started the process of dismantling Bullfrog. But I'm pretty sure it's one of those things that is undocumented and can't be proven, it was just widely discussed at the time and has entered unwritten knowledge. I'm going to edit the article so that it doesn't immediately disagree with itself after stating something. --Harmonica 01:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DK2
- Why does the wiki link for Dungeon Keeper 2 redirect back to the Dungeon Keeper article? They're separate games, even if they are part of a series. That's like having the wiki link for Star Trek II link back to the article for Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Sure, they're part of a series, but they're still different things.
-
- It's because someone set up Dungeon Keeper 2 to redirect to Dungeon Keeper because of no one having made an article for DK2 yet. Then, someone made the mention of DK2 a wikilink (is that the term?), which ends up causing a loop. It happens often. Solution? Write the article for the thing in question and remove it's redirect quality. MardukZero 06:00, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
-
-
- Well, I begun new article about DK2, but I need help. --Winterheart 14:52, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Incredible that such a game had no article until this year!! -- ARC Gritt 13:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I have contacted EA (parent company of Bullfrog) by phone and by letter and all I got was a reference to a release schedule for a few months ahead, which obviously did not contain the title, and the line about "Althought the Dungeon Kepper series is an important franchise for there are no plans at this time to commence redevelopment". I don't see why it has to go overground, look what happens to the James Bond films, they are in the process of being ultimately digitised once again, to within an inch of their lives. Bullfrog could just release the game now with new graphics, possibly fit for 3D monitors and cross platform.
[edit] DK3
Would it be a good idea to have some links to petitions that are currently running regarding putting DK3 into development? Also, who actually owns the rights for this? The article indicates people are hopeful Lionhead Studios would start development, but surely it is EA who actually owns the rights as they took over Bullfrog.Matty gibbon 15:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spells
I'm new to the idea of wikipedia...would a list of spells and their uses/effects be appropriate in this article? and also possibly a mention of the absolute uselessness of the instruction book? (at least a third of the information given in it is incorrect).
- Throw it out to consensus, add it and see what happens. The instruction book bit is probably extrenuous though :) Mallocks 17:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] PC/other platforms
I remember this game for the Amiga. Was it primarily a PC release? --84.65.153.30 22:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- It was PC only. No Amiga version was ever made. WindowsKiller 14:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] External Links
I have added http://dungeonkeeper.co.uk to the External links as it is a relative site --The Itchy One 23:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Removed. The site doesn't contain anything useful (yet) and Wikipedia is not there to help promoting websites. WindowsKiller 10:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Added back again, the site contains useful files such as patches and updates which are required to run Dungeon Keeper in Windows XP, have a proper look first --The Itchy One 13:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Reworded link
- "have a proper look first" ? That's a joke, isn't it? You have added those patches AFTER I removed the link. Anyway, read the external links guidelines, please. Wikipedia is not your personal platform to promote your website. Currently, your website doesn't contain anything special. WindowsKiller 14:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
