User talk:24.251.68.75

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read Talk:Movement for unification of Romania and the Republic of Moldova before reverting again! bogdan 13:17, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Node ue, if this is you, it is recommended that you admit it, otherwise it is pretty much sockpuppeting, especially when you post on a talk page like Talk:Eastern Romance languages in support of an edit by Node ue without identifying yourself as Node, if it's you. If you claim it is not you, then I'd like an IP check done, though that wouldn't prove it's not you, since one can easily edit Wikipedia from different IP ranges. Alexander 007 03:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I don't recall insulting people based on their ethnicity in any Moldovan language dispute. Unless you link examples, this is slander. Alexander 007 03:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

If you expect that I am an extremist in this debate, wrong. I am of the opinion that the Moldovan language problem is pretty much the same as the Montenegrin language problem, except that Moldovan is recognized as the official language or the nomenclature for the official language of the Rep of Moldova. However, I am against the infobox being added and against any misconception that it is just the "Romanian POV" that Moldovan is Romanian, which was Khoikhoi's problem. Folk need to be more moderate in this debate; no need to resort to jabs at "Wallachians" and other stupid stuff you used to do, and no need for Bonaparte to raise a circus over this either, and make reference to your sexual orientation, call Mikkalai an "anti-Romanian chauvinist", etc. etc. If you want the infobox added back, give good reasons. Alexander 007 03:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC)