Children overboard affair

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The asylum-seeker laden SIEV-4, the vessel at the centre of the children overboard affair.

The children overboard affair is an Australian political scandal which arose in 2001 when the government claimed that “a number of children had been thrown overboard” from a “suspected illegal entry vessel” (or SIEV) which had been intercepted by HMAS Adelaide off Christmas Island. The vessel, designated SIEV 4, was carrying a number of asylum seekers, and believed to be operated by people smugglers.

The claim was first announced by the then Minister for Immigration, Philip Ruddock on 7 October 2001, and repeated in subsequent days and weeks by senior Government ministers, including the Minister for Defence, Peter Reith, and Prime Minister John Howard.

The motivation of those allegedly throwing their children overboard, according to those who reported the incident, was to effectively "force" the Royal Australian Navy to rescue the children and their parents. The claim was used to cast doubt on the passengers of SIEV 4 as genuine refugees, instead characterising them as people prepared to use unscrupulous means to gain illegal entry into Australia.

A subsequent inquiry by a Senate select committee found that not only was the claim untrue, but that the government knew the claim to be untrue before the Federal elections, which were held one month later. Part of the title of the main report prepared by the committee has become synonymous with the scandal: a certain maritime incident.

1 Background
2 Senate inquiry and findings
3 Scrafton and the reopened inquiry
4 See also
5 External links

[edit] Background

The incident occurred two months after the Tampa incident, where a Norwegian container ship had rescued Afghan asylum seekers and sought to drop them off in Indonesia before being forced to turn towards Australia. This series of events became the catalyst for the adoption by the Howard government of a stricter border protection regime, the stated purpose of which was to prevent unauthorised arrivals from reaching Australia by boat.

In the lead up to the children overboard affair the government had therefore been seeking public support for this regime, and the incident may have helped garner this support. The children overboard affair subsequently spawned many investigative journalist reports and several books.

Political analysts believe that the children overboard affair worked in favour of the incumbent Coalition government. With the election campaign underway, the Coalition was depicted as favouring strong border protection measures, while the opposition Labor Party was conversely depicted as "weak" on this issue.

[edit] Senate inquiry and findings

The Senate inquiry found that no children were thrown from SIEV 4. Evidence obtained by the committee revealed that the claim regarding children being thrown overboard was false.

The pictures which had been purported to show that children had been thrown into the sea were taken during a rescue after SIEV 4 had sunk. When this was discovered, Howard claimed that he was acting on the intelligence he was given at the time. It was later revealed that Howard had been informed on 7 November that the claim was false. On 26 February 2006 Howard said, "They irresponsibly sank the damn boat, which put their children in the water".

The Senate inquiry found that passengers aboard other SIEVs had threatened children, sabotaged their own vessels, committed self-harm, and, in the case of SIEV-7 on 22 October, a child had been thrown overboard and rescued by another asylum seeker.^[1]

[edit] Scrafton and the reopened inquiry

In August 2004, Michael Scrafton, who had been a senior advisor to Peter Reith, came forward to say that before John Howard confirmed that children had indeed been thrown overboard, he had been informed that this claim was false. On 14 February 2006 Peter Reith said "It was not raised with me as to whether or not children had been thrown overboard, and in fact some weeks later, I was still under the impression that there was no question that children were thrown overboard.....no report was given to me."

Although the Senate enquiry was reopened, Scrafton's claims were criticised. In particular, Scrafton's claimed that he and Howard had spoken three times on the telephone, but telephone records allowed Howard to maintain that they only spoke twice.

Scrafton's revelations and the reopening of the inquiry occurred close to the announcement of the 2004 Federal election. The children overboard affair received widespread coverage and discussion within political and media circles and was made a central part of the Australian Labor Party's election campaign.