Disputatio Usoris:Shultz

E Vicipaedia

Welcome to the Latin Wikipedia,

if you have any questions, please ask in the Vicipaedia:Taberna or put your questions on my talkpage. Here is the official welcome ...

Salve!

Gratus aut grata apud Vicipaediam Latinam acciperis! Ob collata tua gratias agimus speramusque fore ut delecteris et manere velis. Cum Vicipaedia nostra parva humilisque sit, paucae et exiguae sunt paginae auxilii, sed quid ni his incipias?

Si plura de modis et moribus Vicipaedianis scire vis, tibi suademus, ut Vicipaediam aliam adeas, exempli causa:

In ipsis paginis mos noster non est nomen dare, sed in paginis disputationis memento scriptis tuis subsignare, litteris imprimendis ~~~~, quae sua sponte et nomen tuum et diem dabunt. Etsi in paginis ipsis lingua Latina tantum uti liceat, in paginis disputationis qualibet lingua scribas. Si quid interrogare volueris, vel apud Tabernam vel in pagina mea disputationis rogato. Ave, spero te "Vicipaedianum" aut "Vicipaedianam" fieri velle!

--Roland2 08:52, 12 Martii 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] first car

Actually not quite. Cinetum is a neuter word, the same form serving for both nominative and accusative singular. Cineta is actually the nominative and accusative plural form of nouns that end in -um (second declension neuters). Your caption actually read "first cars".--Ioshus Rocchio 01:12, 31 Martii 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] as politely as possible

Please do not create unwanted work for other people. I personally have little to no interest in Jimbo Wales, and much less in translating/deleting or modifying in any other way wiki formulae/external links from the english parent page, and I would imagine if anyone else had, it would have been done by now.
If you do not know how to say something, please ask. Most of our users speak english fine and can help you avoid mistakes like Iacobus Cambrius and prima autocineta.--Ioshus Rocchio 23:50, 6 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] For the Automatic Teller Machine

Hi, I've answered on my talk page. --Roland2 07:02, 29 Aprilis 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] here we are again

Leave the Jimmy Wales page alone, please...wikipedia says all sorts of things, like Tupac is alive...you should not believe everything you read.--Ioshus Rocchio 13:32, 1 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

I have corrected that page twice. If you look again, you wills see it now says, in lower case letters, as is also the neolatin custom, Iacobus Wales.--Ioshus Rocchio 02:02, 2 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

Aha, beat me to it.--Ioshus Rocchio 02:02, 2 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] dubcat

Dubcat does not mean stub, stipula means stub.--Ioshus Rocchio 13:33, 1 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

[recensere] numerals

Latin does not necessarily = roman. Many people used latin, from the wall of hadrian, to the tigris and the euphrates, to moscow, to karthage. They used it for millenia, almost 2 full ones. Over time things changed. I don't know who told you to use roman numerals here, or why you got the impression that they were supposed to be used here, but have a look at Vicipaedia:Numeri_Romani, also see, Vicipaedia:Taberna#Roman_numerals.2Fnumeri_romani, also see, Vicipaedia:Auxilium_pro_editione_(latine). All quite clearly expressly admonish against using Roman numerals for almost anything. They are huge, cumbersome, and unintelligible, when they get large, to someone without significant practice in them. The purpose here is to give information, not withhold it. The ratio, established long before I was around, is that roman numerals actually detract from the clarity of the information trying to be conveyed, because even people who are perfectly fluent in latin are not fluent in the use of roman numerals. Latin is great, roman numerals aren't... just as the alphabet was adopted and hailed as a great literary and linguistic achievement, so were arabic numerals a momumental achievement in mathematical history. We choose to go with better.--Ioshus Rocchio 14:04, 2 Iunii 2006 (UTC)

Receptum de "http://la.wikipedia.org../../../s/h/u/Disputatio_Usoris%7EShultz_58bc.html"